> [!todo]
> - [ ] review @bjorck_2016 on crisis typologies
| Period | <18th Century | 19th C | 20th C | 21st C |
| ---------------------------- | ---------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------- |
| Disruption | Weather & Warfare | Economic & Weather | War & Economic | Economic & Pandemic |
| Impact | regional hunger or famine | famines begin and end, respectively | disruptions impact all islands | disruptions affect entire globe |
| Mitigation Strategy | Crop/production system diversity, *Kapu* | New crop integration, | Central planning, Market integrated storage | Entitlement programs |
| Response/Adaptation Strategy | food alternates, Migration | Migration, *poi palaai* | | Civil society safety net, Transfer entitlements |
Looking at your Food Crisis Typology Timeline and thinking about the **dual vulnerability** concept, here's how vulnerability types could be classified across periods:
> [!llm]
> ## Vulnerability Type Definitions:
>
> **Ecological Vulnerability** (<18th Century):
> - Directly exposed to **environmental hazards** (drought, warfare)
> - **Localized impacts** - disruptions affect specific regions
> - **Built-in resilience** through biodiversity and social systems
> - Risk stems from **immediate environmental/social factors**
>
> **Integration Vulnerability** (19th C - First Food Regime):
> - Vulnerability emerges from **incorporation into global systems**
> - **Transition period** - old systems breaking down, new ones not yet stable
> - **Sandalwood famine** shows how external economic demand creates internal food crisis
> - **One-way vulnerability** - external economic forces disrupt local systems
>
> **Dual Vulnerability** (20th C - Second Food Regime):
> - **Export disruption** (plantation crops can't reach markets)
> - **Import disruption** (food supplies can't reach population)
> - **Same infrastructure** serves both vulnerabilities (ships)
> - Maritime strikes perfectly demonstrate this dual exposure
>
> **Systemic Vulnerability** (21st C - Third Food Regime):
> - **Global cascading effects** - local disruptions have worldwide impact
> - **Financialized vulnerabilities** - supply chains, just-in-time delivery
> - **Corporate concentration** creates single points of failure
> - **Sharetaker responses** may reproduce rather than solve systemic vulnerabilities
>
> ## Key Evolution Pattern:
>
> **Localized → Integration → Dual → Systemic**
>
> Each period doesn't eliminate previous vulnerabilities but **adds new layers**. The Third Regime still has ecological vulnerability (climate change), integration vulnerability (global markets), AND dual vulnerability (import/export), PLUS new systemic vulnerabilities from corporate consolidation and financialization.
>
> This progression shows why **sharetaker solutions** may be insufficient - they address **dual vulnerability** (import dependence) but potentially **intensify systemic vulnerability** through corporate control.
**Localized → Integration → Dual → Systemic**